Which statement best describes evaluation and revision in the design process?

Which statement best describes evaluation and revision in the design process?

• A. Formative and summative evaluations do not affect future design.
• B. Evaluation should occur only after program deployment.
• C. Revision should be avoided if outcomes look positive.
• D. Evaluation results should be used to guide ongoing improvements.

Answer: (D)

Evaluation drives improvement through a continuous feedback loop. In design, you gather information during development (formative) to fix issues early, and you assess the finished result after deployment (summative) to judge overall success. The important point is that what you learn from both stages should steer ongoing changes and refinements. That openness to revision based on evidence is what keeps a design evolving to better meet needs. The other ideas miss this iterative, evidence-based approach: feedback influencing future work, evaluation occurring only at the end, or stopping revisions when outcomes look good would hamper ongoing improvement.

Evaluation drives improvement through a continuous feedback loop. In design, you gather information during development (formative) to fix issues early, and you assess the finished result after deployment (summative) to judge overall success. The important point is that what you learn from both stages should steer ongoing changes and refinements. That openness to revision based on evidence is what keeps a design evolving to better meet needs. The other ideas miss this iterative, evidence-based approach: feedback influencing future work, evaluation occurring only at the end, or stopping revisions when outcomes look good would hamper ongoing improvement.